Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Public Safety & Wellbeing

Safe and secure individuals and families, shelter, neighborhoods, schools and workplaces not only influence overall health and economic development, but also vibrant tourism encouraging visitors to enjoy regional attractions. The community accepts and exercises responsibility to care for its most vulnerable populations, and ensures that others are provided opportunities to achieve sustainable lives.
 

Safety & Security

The "feeling of safety" can have more of an impact on an individual's daily life than reported crime rates, allowing seniors to be more self-sufficient in safe neighborhoods, students to focus on learning in safe schools, employees to travel safely to work and be more productive, and families to feel safe in their homes.


Victims of domestic violence cross racial and ethnic, socio-economic and gender lines.

While only about a third of all crime is reported, the Crime Index is the most commonly used measure of crime and is a consistent sample that allows for national comparisons. 

Schools should be safe havens where the focus is on education.  Monitoring violence ensures that schools remain safe learning environments.  There is a great deal of community concern that serious situations have become more common in recent years, in part, because of media attention.


Social Equity

Limited income, homelessness and food insecurity indicate that assistance may be needed for individuals and families regardless of  age, gender, socio-economics, or other racial and ethnic diversity, including effective programs to improve self-sufficiency and life outcomes for all peoples.


Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

PUBLIC SAFETY

PUBLIC SAFETY

PUBLIC SAFETY

Crime Index

Value
Compared to:

PUBLIC SAFETY

Crime Index

Value
Compared to:

Crime Index County: Washoe

Current Value:

Crime Index County: Washoe

28.0
Rate per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (30.2), Washoe has a value of 28.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(30.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.4), Washoe has a value of 28.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.4 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (28.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (27.5).
Prior Value
(27.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

High School Students who have been Electronically Bullied County: Washoe

Current Value:

High School Students who have been Electronically Bullied County: Washoe

18.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.9%), Washoe has a value of 18.6% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (18.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

PUBLIC SAFETY

Elder Abuse Crime Rate

Value
Compared to:

PUBLIC SAFETY

Elder Abuse Crime Rate

Value
Compared to:

Elder Abuse Crime Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Elder Abuse Crime Rate County: Washoe

3.5
Rate per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.3), Washoe has a value of 3.5 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (3.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.7).
Prior Value
(3.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

PUBLIC SAFETY

Domestic Violence Crime Rate

Value
Compared to:

PUBLIC SAFETY

Domestic Violence Crime Rate

Value
Compared to:

Domestic Violence Crime Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Domestic Violence Crime Rate County: Washoe

7.2
Rate per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (9.7), Washoe has a value of 7.2 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(9.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (7.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.3).
Prior Value
(7.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

PUBLIC SAFETY

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Value
Compared to:

PUBLIC SAFETY

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Value
Compared to:

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Washoe

Current Value:

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths County: Washoe

32.2%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 32.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 32.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (27.6%), Washoe has a value of 32.2% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(27.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Washoe has a value of 32.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (32.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.2%).
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions County: Washoe

10.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 10.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.3), Washoe has a value of 10.7 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Washoe has a value of 10.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (10.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.8).
Prior Value
(9.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

PUBLIC SAFETY

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Value
Compared to:

PUBLIC SAFETY

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide County: Washoe

5.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 5.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (6.8), Washoe has a value of 5.2 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(6.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Washoe has a value of 5.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (5.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.6).
Prior Value
(4.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

PUBLIC SAFETY

Age-adjusted Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

PUBLIC SAFETY

Age-adjusted Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-adjusted Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-adjusted Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate County: Washoe

68.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (53.5), Washoe has a value of 68.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(53.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.6), Washoe has a value of 68.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(57.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (68.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (59.2).
Prior Value
(59.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

PUBLIC SAFETY

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Value
Compared to:

PUBLIC SAFETY

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms County: Washoe

14.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 14.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (15.9), Washoe has a value of 14.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Washoe has a value of 14.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (14.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.7).
Prior Value
(14.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

PUBLIC SAFETY

Addressing Safety Along the Truckee River

Value
Compared to:

PUBLIC SAFETY

Addressing Safety Along the Truckee River

Value
Compared to:

Addressing Safety Along the Truckee River County: Washoe

Current Value:

Addressing Safety Along the Truckee River County: Washoe

85.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Community Target (100%), the target has not been met.
Community Target
(100%)

CHILD SAFETY

CHILD SAFETY

CHILD SAFETY

Child Abuse Removal Rate

Value
Compared to:

CHILD SAFETY

Child Abuse Removal Rate

Value
Compared to:

Child Abuse Removal Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Child Abuse Removal Rate County: Washoe

2.5
Rate per 1,000 children
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.8), Washoe has a value of 2.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(3.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.8).
Prior Value
(2.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Day Care Center and Preschool Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Washoe

Current Value:

Day Care Center and Preschool Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Washoe

6.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 6.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.9%), Washoe has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (6.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

CHILD SAFETY

Price of Licensed Child Care

Value
Compared to:

CHILD SAFETY

Price of Licensed Child Care

Value
Compared to:

Price of Licensed Child Care County: Washoe

Current Value:

Price of Licensed Child Care County: Washoe

$8,874
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe ($8,874) is less and better than the previously measured value ($9,181).
Prior Value
($9,181)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

CHILD SAFETY

Children in Transition (CIT) Count

Value
Compared to:

CHILD SAFETY

Children in Transition (CIT) Count

Value
Compared to:

Children in Transition (CIT) Count County: Washoe

Current Value:

Children in Transition (CIT) Count County: Washoe

2,026
Count of WCSD students without permanent housing during the school year
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2,026) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,950).
Prior Value
(1,950)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

CHILD SAFETY

Child Abuse

Value
Compared to:

CHILD SAFETY

Child Abuse

Value
Compared to:

Child Abuse County: Washoe

Current Value:

Child Abuse County: Washoe

6,088
Number of referrals per reports received
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (6,088) is less and better than the previously measured value (7,173).
Prior Value
(7,173)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

CHILD SAFETY

Child Abuse and Neglect Substantiated Reports

Value
Compared to:

CHILD SAFETY

Child Abuse and Neglect Substantiated Reports

Value
Compared to:

Child Abuse and Neglect Substantiated Reports County: Washoe

Current Value:

Child Abuse and Neglect Substantiated Reports County: Washoe

33.6%
Percent (%) substantiated reports
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (26.8%), Washoe has a value of 33.6% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(26.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.2%), Washoe has a value of 33.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.2% in 2010)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (33.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (30.3%).
Prior Value
(30.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Washoe

Current Value:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Washoe

88.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 88.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 28.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 88.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (90.6%), Washoe has a value of 88.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Washoe has a value of 88.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (88.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (88.3%).
Prior Value
(88.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

Community Doing More for the Health and Safety of the Truckee River

Value
Compared to:

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

Community Doing More for the Health and Safety of the Truckee River

Value
Compared to:

Community Doing More for the Health and Safety of the Truckee River County: Washoe

Current Value:

Community Doing More for the Health and Safety of the Truckee River County: Washoe

96.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Community Target (100%), the target has not been met.
Community Target
(100%)

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

Park Acreage Rate

Value
Compared to:

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

Park Acreage Rate

Value
Compared to:

Park Acreage Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Park Acreage Rate County: Washoe

3.79
Park acreage rate per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (3.79) is less and worse than the previously measured value (3.87).
Prior Value
(3.87)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

Parks and Playgrounds

Value
Compared to:

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

Parks and Playgrounds

Value
Compared to:

Parks and Playgrounds County: Washoe

Current Value:

Parks and Playgrounds County: Washoe

94
Number of parks and playgrounds
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (94) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94).
Prior Value
(94)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

People Spending Time at Parks Along the Truckee River

Value
Compared to:

WELLNESS & RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES

People Spending Time at Parks Along the Truckee River

Value
Compared to:

People Spending Time at Parks Along the Truckee River County: Washoe

Current Value:

People Spending Time at Parks Along the Truckee River County: Washoe

80.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Community Target (100%), the target has not been met.
Community Target
(100%)

FOOD SECURITY

FOOD SECURITY

FOOD SECURITY

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

FOOD SECURITY

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Washoe

9.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (13.0%), Washoe has a value of 9.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Washoe has a value of 9.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (9.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.2%).
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

FOOD SECURITY

Child Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

FOOD SECURITY

Child Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Washoe

11.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.5%), Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (11.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

FOOD SECURITY

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

FOOD SECURITY

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

Food Environment Index County: Washoe

Current Value:

Food Environment Index County: Washoe

8.1
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.6.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (6.8), Washoe has a value of 8.1 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(6.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Washoe has a value of 8.1 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (8.1) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.8).
Prior Value
(7.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

FOOD SECURITY

Community Spending on Food

Value
Compared to:

FOOD SECURITY

Community Spending on Food

Value
Compared to:

Community Spending on Food County: Washoe

Current Value:

Community Spending on Food County: Washoe

12.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (12.6%), Washoe has a value of 12.6%.
NV Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.6%), Washoe has a value of 12.6%.
US Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (12.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.6%).
Prior Value
(12.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance County: Washoe

Current Value:

Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance County: Washoe

32%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 32% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 32% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,134 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (35%), Washoe has a value of 32% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(35%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Washoe has a value of 32% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (32%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33%).
Prior Value
(33%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

FOOD SECURITY

Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Value
Compared to:

FOOD SECURITY

Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Value
Compared to:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children County: Washoe

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children County: Washoe

44.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (48.4%), Washoe has a value of 44.5%.
NV Value
(48.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Washoe has a value of 44.5%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

FOOD SECURITY

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Value
Compared to:

FOOD SECURITY

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Washoe

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Washoe

9,001
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Nevada Tomorrow