Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Land Use, Housing & Infrastructure

Housing and mobility options enable families to be more self-sufficient and businesses to be more profitable, while creative development allows for new ways to address community issues. The region has a view to improve with appropriate, affordable housing for all residents, as well as varied land uses to support diverse business development, economic growth and different types of active outdoor lifestyles.

This Community Dashboard sponsored by:

    

 


Affordable Housing
 Whether a typical family earning median wages can qualify for a mortgage loan, is especially important because housing is usually a family's largest expense, and transportation costs rise dramatically when families live farther away from the area they work and shop.
The Housing Opportunity Index (HOI) is defined as the share of homes that would have been affordable to a family earning the local median income based on standard mortgage underwriting criteria. National Association of Home Builders assumes that a family can afford to spend 28% of its gross income on housing. In addition to principal and interest; cost then also includes estimated property taxes and property insurance for the home. Mortgage insurance is not currently a component of the HOI.


The percentage of homes considered affordable for families making the median income began to decrease due to the rise in the median sales price since 2011, while family median income has remained almost the same for a decade, until just recently. The 2016 median sales price was as high as pre-recession prices, and continues to rise to new highs annually.


The County Health Rankings measure severe housing problems as the percentage of households with at least 1 of 4 housing problems: overcrowding (>1.5 persons/room), high housing costs (monthly >50% of income, excluding utilities), or lack of kitchen or plumbing facilities. Inadequate or poor quality housing contributes to health problems such as infectious and chronic diseases, injuries and child development issues.  Adequate housing should provide a sense of privacy, security, stability and control. The top US performers have 9% severe housing problems, substantially below Washoe County.


Mobility & Transport

Access to affordable and reliable modes of transportation, plus alternative and active transit options indicate an effective transportation system with a diversity of choices critical to our economy, traffic congestion, and the environment.


The 2040 Regional Transportation Plan set a 15% performance target for alternative mode share use by 2040 in the transit service area. The previous 2035 target of 10% was actually exceeded in the 2015 reporting year. In the future, it would be interesting to identify the percentage of workers over 16 years of age living  within 1/4 mile of an RTC bus stop and riding the bus to work, since the vast majority continue to drive to work alone. 


Infrastructure to move goods and passengers plays as important a role as regional roads and rail transport.  Passenger numbers and cargo poundage continue to increase overtime.


Development for Healthy Neighborhoods

Planning and community development across sectors including active lifestyles, diverse types of recreation and neighborhood livability, proactively promote healthy communities while providing the natural benefits of flood control, purifying air and water, and cooling the regions.


Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Nevada State Demographer Certified Population Estimates

Value
Compared to:

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Nevada State Demographer Certified Population Estimates

Value
Compared to:

Nevada State Demographer Certified Population Estimates County: Washoe

Current Value:

Nevada State Demographer Certified Population Estimates County: Washoe

508,759
Population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (508,759) is greater  than the previously measured value (501,635).
Prior Value
(501,635)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Nevada State Demographer Certified Population Estimates Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Nevada State Demographer Certified Population Estimates Census Place: Reno

277,517
Population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reno (277,517) is greater  than the previously measured value (274,129).
Prior Value
(274,129)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Nevada State Demographer Certified Population Estimates Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Nevada State Demographer Certified Population Estimates Census Place: Sparks

113,816
Population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sparks (113,816) is greater  than the previously measured value (111,735).
Prior Value
(111,735)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Washoe County 20-Year Population Projections

Value
Compared to:

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Washoe County 20-Year Population Projections

Value
Compared to:

Washoe County 20-Year Population Projections County: Washoe

Current Value:

Washoe County 20-Year Population Projections County: Washoe

580,672
Population
(2042)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (580,672) is greater  than the previously measured value (579,146).
Prior Value
(579,146)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Washoe County Consensus Forecast – Total Employment

Value
Compared to:

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Washoe County Consensus Forecast – Total Employment

Value
Compared to:

Washoe County Consensus Forecast – Total Employment County: Washoe

Current Value:

Washoe County Consensus Forecast – Total Employment County: Washoe

379,528
Total employment projection
(2042)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (379,528) is greater and better than the previously measured value (376,835).
Prior Value
(376,835)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Washoe County Consensus Forecast – Total Population

Value
Compared to:

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Washoe County Consensus Forecast – Total Population

Value
Compared to:

Washoe County Consensus Forecast – Total Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Washoe County Consensus Forecast – Total Population County: Washoe

587,479
Population projection
(2042)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (587,479) is greater  than the previously measured value (583,578).
Prior Value
(583,578)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Washoe County Population by Selected Demographics – State Demographer

Value
Compared to:

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Washoe County Population by Selected Demographics – State Demographer

Value
Compared to:

Washoe County Population by Selected Demographics – State Demographer County: Washoe

Current Value:

Washoe County Population by Selected Demographics – State Demographer County: Washoe

501,635
Population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (501,635) is greater  than the previously measured value (485,113).
Prior Value
(485,113)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Washoe County Population Percent Change Over Past 5 Years – State Demographer

Value
Compared to:

Community / Delivery of Essential Services

Washoe County Population Percent Change Over Past 5 Years – State Demographer

Value
Compared to:

Washoe County Population Percent Change Over Past 5 Years – State Demographer County: Washoe

Current Value:

Washoe County Population Percent Change Over Past 5 Years – State Demographer County: Washoe

3.4%
Percent change
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (3.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (2.4%).
Prior Value
(2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions County: Washoe

10.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 10.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.3), Washoe has a value of 10.7 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Washoe has a value of 10.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (10.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.8).
Prior Value
(9.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

Community / Transportation

Air Traffic Cargo Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Air Traffic Cargo Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Value
Compared to:

Air Traffic Cargo Reno-Tahoe International Airport County: Washoe

Current Value:

Air Traffic Cargo Reno-Tahoe International Airport County: Washoe

114,337,660
Pounds of air cargo
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (114,337,660) is less and worse than the previously measured value (139,395,160).
Prior Value
(139,395,160)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Air Traffic Passenger Totals Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Air Traffic Passenger Totals Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Value
Compared to:

Air Traffic Passenger Totals Reno-Tahoe International Airport County: Washoe

Current Value:

Air Traffic Passenger Totals Reno-Tahoe International Airport County: Washoe

4,573,384
Number of passengers
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4,573,384) is greater and better than the previously measured value (4,310,958).
Prior Value
(4,310,958)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Community Spending on Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Community Spending on Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Community Spending on Transportation County: Washoe

Current Value:

Community Spending on Transportation County: Washoe

16.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (18.2%), Washoe has a value of 16.3%.
NV Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), Washoe has a value of 16.3%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (16.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.3%).
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Community / Transportation

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Washoe

Current Value:

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Washoe

3.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (3.4%), Washoe has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (3.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Community / Transportation

Households without a Vehicle

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Households without a Vehicle

Value
Compared to:

Households without a Vehicle County: Washoe

Current Value:

Households without a Vehicle County: Washoe

6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 6.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 6.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.1%), Washoe has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Washoe has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households without a Vehicle Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Households without a Vehicle Census Place: Reno

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of 8.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.1%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 126 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 8.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (6.5%), Reno has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (7.1%), Reno has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Reno has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households without a Vehicle Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Households without a Vehicle Census Place: Sparks

5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of 5.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.1%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 126 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 5.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (6.5%), Sparks has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (7.1%), Sparks has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Sparks has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Mean Travel Time to Work

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Mean Travel Time to Work

Value
Compared to:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Washoe

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Washoe

22.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 22.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.2.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 22.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Washoe has a value of 22.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Washoe has a value of 22.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Reno

20.5
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of 20.5 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.8 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.9.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 89 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 20.5 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (22.3), Reno has a value of 20.5 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Reno has a value of 20.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Reno has a value of 20.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Sparks

23.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of 23.3 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.8 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.9.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 89 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 23.3 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (22.3), Sparks has a value of 23.3 which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Sparks has a value of 23.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Sparks has a value of 23.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

New Bike Lanes

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

New Bike Lanes

Value
Compared to:

New Bike Lanes County: Washoe

Current Value:

New Bike Lanes County: Washoe

4
Miles
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4) is less and worse than the previously measured value (6).
Prior Value
(6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

New Pedestrianways

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

New Pedestrianways

Value
Compared to:

New Pedestrianways County: Washoe

Current Value:

New Pedestrianways County: Washoe

4
Miles
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4).
Prior Value
(4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Access Bus Passengers

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Access Bus Passengers

Value
Compared to:

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Access Bus Passengers County: Washoe

Current Value:

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Access Bus Passengers County: Washoe

105,614
RTC Access ridership
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (105,614) is less and worse than the previously measured value (118,659).
Prior Value
(118,659)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Transit Bus Passengers

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Transit Bus Passengers

Value
Compared to:

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Transit Bus Passengers County: Washoe

Current Value:

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Transit Bus Passengers County: Washoe

4,865,750
RTC Transit ridership
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4,865,750) is greater and better than the previously measured value (3,597,006).
Prior Value
(3,597,006)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Value
Compared to:

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute County: Washoe

Current Value:

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute County: Washoe

24.1%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (31.8%), Washoe has a value of 24.1% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.0%), Washoe has a value of 24.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (24.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation County: Washoe

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation County: Washoe

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 1.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 1.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Washoe has a value of 1.9% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Washoe has a value of 1.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Census Place: Reno

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (1.9%), Reno has a value of 2.6% which is higher and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Reno has a value of 2.6% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Reno has a value of 2.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Census Place: Sparks

1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (1.9%), Sparks has a value of 1.8% which is lower and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Sparks has a value of 1.8% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Sparks has a value of 1.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Community / Transportation

Workers who Bike to Work

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Workers who Bike to Work

Value
Compared to:

Workers who Bike to Work County: Washoe

Current Value:

Workers who Bike to Work County: Washoe

0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 0.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
NV Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (0.3%), Washoe has a value of 0.4% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Washoe has a value of 0.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Bike to Work Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Workers who Bike to Work Census Place: Reno

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (0.4%), Reno has a value of 0.7% which is higher and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(0.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (0.3%), Reno has a value of 0.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Reno has a value of 0.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Bike to Work Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Workers who Bike to Work Census Place: Sparks

0.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (0.4%), Sparks has a value of 0.2% which is lower and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(0.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (0.3%), Sparks has a value of 0.2% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Sparks has a value of 0.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Value
Compared to:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work County: Washoe

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work County: Washoe

71.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 71.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 75.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 71.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (73.6%), Washoe has a value of 71.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Washoe has a value of 71.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Census Place: Reno

69.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of 69.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 75.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.5%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 119 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 69.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 85.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,625 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (71.5%), Reno has a value of 69.5% which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(71.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (73.6%), Reno has a value of 69.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Reno has a value of 69.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Census Place: Sparks

74.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of 74.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 75.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.5%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 119 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 74.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 85.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,625 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (71.5%), Sparks has a value of 74.9% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(71.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (73.6%), Sparks has a value of 74.9% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Sparks has a value of 74.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Workers who Walk to Work

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Workers who Walk to Work

Value
Compared to:

Workers who Walk to Work County: Washoe

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work County: Washoe

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 2.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 2.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (1.5%), Washoe has a value of 2.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Washoe has a value of 2.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Walk to Work Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work Census Place: Reno

2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (2.0%), Reno has a value of 2.7% which is higher and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (1.5%), Reno has a value of 2.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Reno has a value of 2.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Walk to Work Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work Census Place: Sparks

1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (2.0%), Sparks has a value of 1.3% which is lower and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (1.5%), Sparks has a value of 1.3% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Sparks has a value of 1.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Children in Transition (CIT) Count

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Children in Transition (CIT) Count

Value
Compared to:

Children in Transition (CIT) Count County: Washoe

Current Value:

Children in Transition (CIT) Count County: Washoe

2,026
Count of WCSD students without permanent housing during the school year
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2,026) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,950).
Prior Value
(1,950)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Community Spending on Housing

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Community Spending on Housing

Value
Compared to:

Community Spending on Housing County: Washoe

Current Value:

Community Spending on Housing County: Washoe

32.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (32.3%), Washoe has a value of 32.5%.
NV Value
(32.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.1%), Washoe has a value of 32.5%.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (32.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (32.4%).
Prior Value
(32.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Washoe

Current Value:

Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Washoe

17.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.2%), Washoe has a value of 17.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.3%).
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homelessness: Chronically Homeless

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homelessness: Chronically Homeless

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness: Chronically Homeless County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homelessness: Chronically Homeless County: Washoe

68
Count of persons chronically homeless
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (68) is less and better than the previously measured value (100).
Prior Value
(100)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homelessness: PIT Count of Persons in Weekly Motels

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homelessness: PIT Count of Persons in Weekly Motels

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness: PIT Count of Persons in Weekly Motels County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homelessness: PIT Count of Persons in Weekly Motels County: Washoe

2,132
Count of persons experiencing homelessness living in weekly motels
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2,132) is less and better than the previously measured value (2,302).
Prior Value
(2,302)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homelessness: Point-in-Time (PIT) Count

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homelessness: Point-in-Time (PIT) Count

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness: Point-in-Time (PIT) Count County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homelessness: Point-in-Time (PIT) Count County: Washoe

1,690
Count of persons experiencing homelessness
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (1,690) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,605).
Prior Value
(1,605)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homelessness: Transitional Aged Youth 18-24

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homelessness: Transitional Aged Youth 18-24

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness: Transitional Aged Youth 18-24 County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homelessness: Transitional Aged Youth 18-24 County: Washoe

8
Count of youth aged 18-24 experiencing homelessness
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (8) is less and better than the previously measured value (12).
Prior Value
(12)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homelessness: Veterans

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homelessness: Veterans

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness: Veterans County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homelessness: Veterans County: Washoe

15
Count of unsheltered veterans
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (15) is less and better than the previously measured value (16).
Prior Value
(16)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Washoe

15.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.3%), Washoe has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (15.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Value
Compared to:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate County: Washoe

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 1.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 1.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (1.2%), Washoe has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Washoe has a value of 1.1%.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place: Reno

1.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 1.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (1.1%), Reno has a value of 1.4% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (1.2%), Reno has a value of 1.4% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Reno has a value of 1.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place: Sparks

0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 0.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (1.1%), Sparks has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (1.2%), Sparks has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Sparks has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homeownership

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homeownership

Value
Compared to:

Homeownership County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homeownership County: Washoe

54.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 54.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 54.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Washoe has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Washoe has a value of 54.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeownership Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Homeownership Census Place: Reno

45.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of 45.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 41.2%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 128 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 45.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,990 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (54.0%), Reno has a value of 45.4% which is lower and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Reno has a value of 45.4% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Reno has a value of 45.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeownership Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Homeownership Census Place: Sparks

55.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of 55.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 41.2%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 128 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 55.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,990 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (54.0%), Sparks has a value of 55.2% which is higher and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Sparks has a value of 55.2% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Sparks has a value of 55.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Housing Opportunity Index (HOI) Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Housing Opportunity Index (HOI) Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Housing Opportunity Index (HOI) Ranking Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): Reno-Sparks

Current Value:

Housing Opportunity Index (HOI) Ranking Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): Reno-Sparks

20.1
Share of homes affordable for median income
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reno-Sparks (20.1) is less and worse than the previously measured value (23.3).
Prior Value
(23.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno-Sparks value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Median Household Gross Rent

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Median Household Gross Rent

Value
Compared to:

Median Household Gross Rent County: Washoe

Current Value:

Median Household Gross Rent County: Washoe

$1,401
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of $1,401 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,004 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,254.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,382), Washoe has a value of $1,401 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($1,382)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Washoe has a value of $1,401 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Household Gross Rent Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Median Household Gross Rent Census Place: Reno

$1,360
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of $1,360 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,170 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,463.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 75 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($1,401), Reno has a value of $1,360 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($1,401)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,382), Reno has a value of $1,360 which is lower and better.
NV Value
($1,382)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Reno has a value of $1,360 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Household Gross Rent Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Median Household Gross Rent Census Place: Sparks

$1,526
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of $1,526 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,170 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,463.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 75 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($1,401), Sparks has a value of $1,526 which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
($1,401)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,382), Sparks has a value of $1,526 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($1,382)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Sparks has a value of $1,526 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Median Housing Unit Value

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Median Housing Unit Value

Value
Compared to:

Median Housing Unit Value County: Washoe

Current Value:

Median Housing Unit Value County: Washoe

$460,000
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of $460,000 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $242,200 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $174,600.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value ($373,800), Washoe has a value of $460,000 which is higher and better.
NV Value
($373,800)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Washoe has a value of $460,000 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Housing Unit Value Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Median Housing Unit Value Census Place: Reno

$462,100
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of $462,100 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $299,500 while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $169,700.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 99 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($460,000), Reno has a value of $462,100 which is higher and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($460,000)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($373,800), Reno has a value of $462,100 which is higher and better.
NV Value
($373,800)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Reno has a value of $462,100 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Housing Unit Value Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Median Housing Unit Value Census Place: Sparks

$423,500
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of $423,500 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $299,500 while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $169,700.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 99 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($460,000), Sparks has a value of $423,500 which is lower and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
($460,000)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($373,800), Sparks has a value of $423,500 which is higher and better.
NV Value
($373,800)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Sparks has a value of $423,500 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

Value
Compared to:

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage County: Washoe

Current Value:

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage County: Washoe

$543
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of $543 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $421 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $479.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value ($491), Washoe has a value of $543 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($491)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Washoe has a value of $543 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage Census Place: Reno

$540
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of $540 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $453 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $540.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 92 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($543), Reno has a value of $540 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($543)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($491), Reno has a value of $540 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($491)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Reno has a value of $540 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage Census Place: Sparks

$502
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of $502 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $453 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $540.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 92 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($543), Sparks has a value of $502 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($543)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($491), Sparks has a value of $502 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($491)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Sparks has a value of $502 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Median Sales Price of Existing Homes

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Median Sales Price of Existing Homes

Value
Compared to:

Median Sales Price of Existing Homes Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): Reno-Sparks

Current Value:

Median Sales Price of Existing Homes Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): Reno-Sparks

$585,800
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($394,600), Reno-Sparks has a value of $585,800 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($394,600)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reno-Sparks ($585,800) is less and better than the previously measured value ($599,600).
Prior Value
($599,600)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno-Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Value
Compared to:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs County: Washoe

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs County: Washoe

$1,965
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of $1,965 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,552 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,766.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,791), Washoe has a value of $1,965 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($1,791)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Washoe has a value of $1,965 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Place: Reno

$1,956
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of $1,956 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,694 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,956.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 88 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($1,965), Reno has a value of $1,956 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($1,965)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,791), Reno has a value of $1,956 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($1,791)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Reno has a value of $1,956 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Place: Sparks

$1,887
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of $1,887 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,694 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,956.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 88 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($1,965), Sparks has a value of $1,887 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($1,965)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,791), Sparks has a value of $1,887 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($1,791)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Sparks has a value of $1,887 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

Value
Compared to:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing County: Washoe

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing County: Washoe

27.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 27.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (30.8%), Washoe has a value of 27.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(30.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Washoe has a value of 27.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (27.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (27.3%).
Prior Value
(27.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place: Reno

24.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reno has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (27.5%), Reno has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(27.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (30.8%), Reno has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(30.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Reno has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Census Place: Sparks

29.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sparks has a value of 29.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (27.5%), Sparks has a value of 29.3% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(27.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (30.8%), Sparks has a value of 29.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(30.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Sparks has a value of 29.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Older Adult Homeowners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Costs County: Washoe

Current Value:

Older Adult Homeowners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Costs County: Washoe

24.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 24.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,243 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (27.5%), Washoe has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(27.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.5%), Washoe has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Older Adult Homeowners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Costs Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Older Adult Homeowners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Costs Census Place: Reno

25.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (24.9%), Reno has a value of 25.5% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (27.5%), Reno has a value of 25.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(27.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.5%), Reno has a value of 25.5%.
US Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Older Adult Homeowners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Costs Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Older Adult Homeowners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing Costs Census Place: Sparks

23.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (24.9%), Sparks has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (27.5%), Sparks has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(27.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.5%), Sparks has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Overcrowded Households

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Overcrowded Households

Value
Compared to:

Overcrowded Households County: Washoe

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households County: Washoe

4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (4.3%), Washoe has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Washoe has a value of 4.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Overcrowded Households Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place: Reno

4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 126 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (4.2%), Reno has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (4.3%), Reno has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Reno has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Overcrowded Households Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households Census Place: Sparks

5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of 5.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 126 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (4.2%), Sparks has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (4.3%), Sparks has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Sparks has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Rate of Homeless Persons Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Rate of Homeless Persons Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Rate of Homeless Persons Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Rate of Homeless Persons Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

332.2
Rate per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (267.3), Washoe has a value of 332.2 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(267.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (195.0), Washoe has a value of 332.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(195.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (332.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (330.9).
Prior Value
(330.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Ratio of Assisted Households to Households in Need

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Ratio of Assisted Households to Households in Need

Value
Compared to:

Ratio of Assisted Households to Households in Need County: Washoe

Current Value:

Ratio of Assisted Households to Households in Need County: Washoe

30%
Percentage of housing assistance to the need for affordable units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (30%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (32%).
Prior Value
(32%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Washoe

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Washoe

49.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 49.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 49.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Washoe has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Washoe has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Reno

50.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of 50.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 104 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 50.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (49.7%), Reno has a value of 50.2% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Reno has a value of 50.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Reno has a value of 50.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Sparks

49.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of 49.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 104 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 49.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (49.7%), Sparks has a value of 49.7%.
Washoe, NV County Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Sparks has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Sparks has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Economy / Housing & Homes

Severe Housing Problems

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Severe Housing Problems

Value
Compared to:

Severe Housing Problems County: Washoe

Current Value:

Severe Housing Problems County: Washoe

17.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.5%), Washoe has a value of 17.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.0%), Washoe has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.9%).
Prior Value
(17.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Subsidized Affordable Housing Inventory

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Subsidized Affordable Housing Inventory

Value
Compared to:

Subsidized Affordable Housing Inventory County: Washoe

Current Value:

Subsidized Affordable Housing Inventory County: Washoe

17.4
Rate of subsidized affordable housing units per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.4) is less and worse than the previously measured value (17.6).
Prior Value
(17.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Washoe

Current Value:

Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Washoe

5.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (6.4%), Washoe has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (5.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.2%).
Prior Value
(5.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Washoe

Current Value:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Washoe

88.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 88.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 65.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 88.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,080 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (91.5%), Washoe has a value of 88.3% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(91.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.0%), Washoe has a value of 88.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Parks

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Parks

Value
Compared to:

Access to Parks County: Washoe

Current Value:

Access to Parks County: Washoe

94.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 94.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (80.7%), Washoe has a value of 94.8% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(80.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (94.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (88.8%).
Prior Value
(88.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Amenities Available Along the Truckee River

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Amenities Available Along the Truckee River

Value
Compared to:

Amenities Available Along the Truckee River County: Washoe

Current Value:

Amenities Available Along the Truckee River County: Washoe

185
Number of Amenities
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Community Target (185), the target has  been met.
Community Target
(185)

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

Food Environment Index County: Washoe

Current Value:

Food Environment Index County: Washoe

7.8
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.4.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,109 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.2), Washoe has a value of 7.8 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(7.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Washoe has a value of 7.8 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (7.8) is less and worse than the previously measured value (8.0).
Prior Value
(8.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Home Heating Fuel Type: Utility Gas

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Home Heating Fuel Type: Utility Gas

Value
Compared to:

Home Heating Fuel Type: Utility Gas County: Washoe

Current Value:

Home Heating Fuel Type: Utility Gas County: Washoe

59.0%
Percent of households
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (57.6%), Washoe has a value of 59.0%.
NV Value
(57.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (46.5%), Washoe has a value of 59.0%.
US Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (59.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (62.5%).
Prior Value
(62.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Houses Built Prior to 1950

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Houses Built Prior to 1950

Value
Compared to:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 County: Washoe

Current Value:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 County: Washoe

4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2.2%), Washoe has a value of 4.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washoe has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Houses Built Prior to 1950 Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 Census Place: Reno

6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of 6.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 128 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,990 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (4.5%), Reno has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (2.2%), Reno has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Reno has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Houses Built Prior to 1950 Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 Census Place: Sparks

3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of 3.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 128 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,990 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (4.5%), Sparks has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (2.2%), Sparks has a value of 3.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Sparks has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Liquor Store Density

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Liquor Store Density

Value
Compared to:

Liquor Store Density County: Washoe

Current Value:

Liquor Store Density County: Washoe

4.9
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.3), Washoe has a value of 4.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(5.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Washoe has a value of 4.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.7).
Prior Value
(4.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Park Acreage Rate

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Park Acreage Rate

Value
Compared to:

Park Acreage Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Park Acreage Rate County: Washoe

3.79
Park acreage rate per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (3.79) is less and worse than the previously measured value (3.87).
Prior Value
(3.87)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Park Acreage Rate Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Park Acreage Rate Census Place: Reno

12.30
Park acreage rate per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (3.79), Reno has a value of 12.30 which is higher and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(3.79)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the prior value, Reno (12.30) is greater and better than the previously measured value (10.95).
Prior Value
(10.95)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Park Acreage Rate Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Park Acreage Rate Census Place: Sparks

5.76
Park acreage rate per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (3.79), Sparks has a value of 5.76 which is higher and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(3.79)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the prior value, Sparks (5.76) is less and worse than the previously measured value (6.00).
Prior Value
(6.00)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Parks and Playgrounds

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Parks and Playgrounds

Value
Compared to:

Parks and Playgrounds County: Washoe

Current Value:

Parks and Playgrounds County: Washoe

94
Number of parks and playgrounds
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (94) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94).
Prior Value
(94)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Parks and Playgrounds Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Parks and Playgrounds Census Place: Reno

142
Number of parks and playgrounds
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reno (142) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (142).
Prior Value
(142)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Parks and Playgrounds Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Parks and Playgrounds Census Place: Sparks

50
Number of parks and playgrounds
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sparks (50) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50).
Prior Value
(50)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

ParkScore® Index Rating

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

ParkScore® Index Rating

Value
Compared to:

ParkScore® Index Rating Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

ParkScore® Index Rating Census Place: Reno

42
ParkScore® Index rating up to 100
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reno (42) is less and worse than the previously measured value (43).
Prior Value
(43)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the ParkScore® Index (100), the target has not been met.
ParkScore® Index
(100)

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Proximity to Highways

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Proximity to Highways

Value
Compared to:

Proximity to Highways County: Washoe

Current Value:

Proximity to Highways County: Washoe

4.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (5.0%), Washoe has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Total Built Acres

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Total Built Acres

Value
Compared to:

Total Built Acres County: Washoe

Current Value:

Total Built Acres County: Washoe

201,975
Acres of land use
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (201,975) is greater  than the previously measured value (201,578).
Prior Value
(201,578)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Built Acres Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Total Built Acres Census Place: Reno

40,358
Acres of land use
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reno (40,358) is greater  than the previously measured value (40,088).
Prior Value
(40,088)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Built Acres Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Total Built Acres Census Place: Sparks

14,056
Acres of land use
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sparks (14,056) is less  than the previously measured value (14,111).
Prior Value
(14,111)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Total Built Dwelling Units

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Total Built Dwelling Units

Value
Compared to:

Total Built Dwelling Units County: Washoe

Current Value:

Total Built Dwelling Units County: Washoe

4,450
Total dwelling units built
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4,450) is greater and better than the previously measured value (3,676).
Prior Value
(3,676)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Built Dwelling Units Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Total Built Dwelling Units Census Place: Reno

2,919
Total dwelling units built
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reno (2,919) is greater and better than the previously measured value (2,183).
Prior Value
(2,183)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Built Dwelling Units Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Total Built Dwelling Units Census Place: Sparks

1,077
Total dwelling units built
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sparks (1,077) is greater and better than the previously measured value (828).
Prior Value
(828)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Water Consumption: Total Production

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Water Consumption: Total Production

Value
Compared to:

Water Consumption: Total Production County: Washoe

Current Value:

Water Consumption: Total Production County: Washoe

88,574
Acre feet
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (88,574) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (88,426).
Prior Value
(88,426)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Water Consumption: Total Retail Water Use (acre feet)

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Water Consumption: Total Retail Water Use (acre feet)

Value
Compared to:

Water Consumption: Total Retail Water Use (acre feet) County: Washoe

Current Value:

Water Consumption: Total Retail Water Use (acre feet) County: Washoe

88,574
Acre feet
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (88,574) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (88,426).
Prior Value
(88,426)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Water Consumption: Usage Per Person

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Water Consumption: Usage Per Person

Value
Compared to:

Water Consumption: Usage Per Person County: Washoe

Current Value:

Water Consumption: Usage Per Person County: Washoe

60,269
Gallons
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (60,269) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (56,787).
Prior Value
(56,787)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Nevada Tomorrow